{rfName}

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Grant support

This work was supported by the EU-AIMS (European Autism Interventions) and AIMS2-TRIALS programmes which receive support from Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking Grant No. 115300 and 777394, the resources of which are composed of financial contributions from the European Union's FP7 and Horizon2020 Programmes, and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) companies' in-kind contributions, and AUTISM SPEAKS, Autistica and SFARI. There was further support from the Horizon2020 programme CANDY (Grant No. 847818). CE PhD funding is provided by the Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. Any views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the funders.

Analysis of institutional authors

Dos Santos, Francisco PascoaAuthorAmil, Adrián FAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Review

From mechanisms to markers: novel noninvasive EEG proxy markers of the neural excitation and inhibition system in humans

Publicated to:Translational Psychiatry. 12 (1): 467- - 2022-11-08 12(1), DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-02218-z

Authors: Ahmad, J; Ellis, C; Leech, R; Voytek, B; Garces, P; Jones, E; Buitelaar, J; Loth, E; dos Santos, FP; Amil, AF; Verschure, PFMJ; Murphy, D; McAlonan, G

Affiliations

Birkbeck Univ London, Ctr Brain & Cognit Dev, London, England - Author
Eodyne Syst SL, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Inst Bioengn Catalonia IBEC, Lab Synthet Percept Emot & Cognit Syst SPECS, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia - Author
Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Forens & Neurodev Sci, London, England - Author
Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Neuroimaging, London, England - Author
Kings Coll London, Sackler Inst Translat Neurodev, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, London, England - Author
NHS Fdn Trust, South London & Maudsley, London, England - Author
Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands - Author
Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Cognit Neurosci, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands - Author
Roche Innovat Ctr Basel, Neurosci & Rare Dis, Roche Pharma Res & Early Dev, Basel, Switzerland - Author
Synthetic, Perceptive, Emotive and Cognitive Systems (SPECS). Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia - Author
Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Cognit Sci, La Jolla, CA USA - Author
Univ Calif San Diego, Halicioglu Data Sci Inst, La Jolla, CA USA - Author
Univ Calif San Diego, Kavli Inst Brain & Mind, La Jolla, CA USA - Author
Univ Calif San Diego, Neurosci Grad Program, La Jolla, CA USA - Author
Univ Greenwich, Sch Human Sci, London, England - Author
Univ Pompeu Fabra UPF, Dept Informat & Commun Technol DTIC, Barcelona, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Brain function is a product of the balance between excitatory and inhibitory (E/I) brain activity. Variation in the regulation of this activity is thought to give rise to normal variation in human traits, and disruptions are thought to potentially underlie a spectrum of neuropsychiatric conditions (e.g., Autism, Schizophrenia, Downs' Syndrome, intellectual disability). Hypotheses related to E/I dysfunction have the potential to provide cross-diagnostic explanations and to combine genetic and neurological evidence that exists within and between psychiatric conditions. However, the hypothesis has been difficult to test because: (1) it lacks specificity-an E/I dysfunction could pertain to any level in the neural system- neurotransmitters, single neurons/receptors, local networks of neurons, or global brain balance - most researchers do not define the level at which they are examining E/I function; (2) We lack validated methods for assessing E/I function at any of these neural levels in humans. As a result, it has not been possible to reliably or robustly test the E/I hypothesis of psychiatric disorders in a large cohort or longitudinal patient studies. Currently available, in vivo markers of E/I in humans either carry significant risks (e.g., deep brain electrode recordings or using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with radioactive tracers) and/or are highly restrictive (e.g., limited spatial extent for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS). More recently, a range of novel Electroencephalography (EEG) features has been described, which could serve as proxy markers for E/I at a given level of inference. Thus, in this perspective review, we survey the theories and experimental evidence underlying 6 novel EEG markers and their biological underpinnings at a specific neural level. These cheap-to-record and scalable proxy markers may offer clinical utility for identifying subgroups within and between diagnostic categories, thus directing more tailored sub-grouping and, therefore, treatment strategies. However, we argue that studies in clinical populations are premature. To maximize the potential of prospective EEG markers, we first need to understand the link between underlying E/I mechanisms and measurement techniques.

Keywords
Cortical networksDirection selectivityExcitation/inhibition balanceFast network oscillationsGaba concentrationGamma oscillation frequencyNeuronal oscillationsRange temporal correlationsSelf-organized criticalityTheta-oscillations

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Translational Psychiatry due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position 29/155, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Psychiatry.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 5.46. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 31.92 (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-10, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 43
  • Scopus: 52
  • OpenCitations: 64
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-10:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 159.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 157 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 4.2.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 8 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Netherlands; Switzerland; United Kingdom; United States of America.